![]() When you open the Pocket mobile app and it detects a web page on the clipboard, it’ll automatically suggest you add that link to your reading list. One of my favorite features in Pocket comes from something as innocuous as pasting a URL. Arguably, for some this is more of a feature than a bug, but my preference falls to Pocket for media. ![]() Still, Instapaper routinely cut images and video out from articles when I used it, while Pocket displayed them all with ease. Case in point, Instapaper just added support for in-line video in an update this month. While Instapaper does support the likes of YouTube and Vimeo, it doesn’t do nearly as good of a job at parsing those things out. On the other hand, in my experience, Pocket is much better at handling images and any built-in media. So, if reading text articles is all you want to do, Instapaper’s the app you want. Pocket only allows you to change the color theme, choose between one serif or san serif font, and alter the text size. Beyond all that, you can also change the spacing and width, which makes the reading experience much more pleasant overall. Subsequently, you get all sorts of options for customizing the font, themes, and text size of an article. Instapaper’s primary focus is the reading experience. Those moods extend throughout the experience. While it’s hard to quantify the “feel” of an app, Pocket’s tone has the jovial relaxed vibe of a pop-up craft store in San Francisco, while Instapaper feels designed for a librarian in Cambridge. Conversely, Pocket is bright, displays images like a proud parent, and flaunts its colors behind bouncy animations. Take a glance at Instapaper and you get a much more serious tone from its newspaper-esque layout, lack of colors, and simple list. While Pocket and Instapaper have similar features, they feel like completely different apps when you’re using them. Now let’s dig into what it’s like to actually use both of these apps. Tons of sorting options to find articles quicklyĮach app has its own list of proud, exclusive features.Follow other users and see their recommended articles.Instant import of URLs from your clipboard in the mobile apps.Built-in social network for publicly sharing articles and finding recommendations.Quick direct sharing with other Pocket users.Here are a few of the features that are exclusive to each service: Heck, both even integrate with the automation service If This Then That.Įven so, Pocket and Instapaper differ pretty dramatically. Both even have text-to-speech options built right in. Both also have offline reading modes for their mobile apps, so you can download articles and read them anywhere, with or without a connection. Both have a special reading mode that strips out excess ads or images, perfect for lightweight devices. Both save anything you find online, from articles to videos, for easy access later. Both Pocket and Instapaper are available have bookmarklets for every browser as well as apps on Android and iOS. Let’s start by addressing the big similarities between Pocket and Instapaper. You create an account, save articles you want to read from any web browser, and the app organizes them and lets you read them in a clean, uncluttered view that ditches most of the ads and focuses on the text. Featuresįor the uninitiated, a “read it later” service is just a fancy bookmarking app. Both are great, but they’ve diverged a bit over the years and play to different strengths. When it comes to “read it later” services that let you save articles today to read when you have time, you only have two serious options these days: Pocket and Instapaper.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |